Discussion Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 2

Discussion - Assignment Example In 1850, he showed three paintings at the Combined Salon in Paris. These paintings included The Stone Breakers, The Huge Burial at Ornans and The Peasant of Flagey. The three paintings presented a depiction of rural life and their stylistic execution was in such a way that they would look post†Romantic’ [Prof. Moore (1), pg.1]. The Huge Burial at Ornans for instance was a major source of hullabaloo. It was a very large painting measuring 3.1 metres by 6.6 metres. The painting depicted the burial of his great uncle at the town of Ornan in September 1848. Gustave in this piece of art presents a real funeral scene. One can clearly see the tranquility and calmness in the painting. Unlike other artists of his time, Gustave did not glorify the setting with flamboyant portrayal of descending angels with God sitting on the throne in the clouds above. This clearly indicates his desire to portray reality. At the foreground, an open grave awaits the coffin while the funeral procession is approaching from the left. Unlike other historical narrative paintings who used models, He uses the actual villagers who were at the ceremony including his sister and mother. This proves his love for realism, which was a major factor that contributed to the â€Å"rise of modernism.† In his portrayal of realism, he encouraged o ther artists to put an end to the norm of creating illusionary images and instead create real images, which represented real life situations. Edouard Manet is another artist who played a major role in the â€Å"rise of modernism.† He was born in Paris, France on 23 January 1832. Manet entered into the studio of Thomas Couture together with his friend Antonio Proust. In 1956, he opened his own studio and stopped working in Couture’s studio. As a young and enthusiastic painter, Eduoard Manet abandoned the teachings he had learnt from Thomas Couture and began painting in his own style. He followed his own

GSK Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

GSK - Case Study Example GSK had several arguments in its defense. First, it argued that it was not breaching any competition laws since national governments already controlled and restricted the pharmaceutical sector (Schultz & Killick 2006, p.2). Secondly, GSK averred that opening up the pharmaceutical sector to parallel market operations would negatively impact on their revenues; hence, hampering their role in research and development. In addition, parallel market operations tended to create shortages of medicine in low-price countries as businesses were buying them from such countries and shipping them off to high-price countries within the EU in order to rake in huge profits. Nevertheless, some arguments clearly compromised GSK’s position. To begin with, GSK could not be exempted from Article 81 of the European Union that outlaws any activity that restricts trade among member states (Covingon & Burling 2005). Limiting parallel market operations would amount to undermining competition within EU member states (Morgan Lewis 2009, p. 1). Secondly, pharmaceutical companies, especially GSK, were not contributing towards the improvement of the production and distribution of medical products. Moreover, GSK had not been party to the promotion of technical and economic growth in their countries of operation. Consequently, the giant pharmaceutical corporation lost the case. Covington & Burling (2005) Parallel Trade in Pharmaceutical Products in Europe: The European Court of Justice’s Ruling in Syfait v. GSK.[Online]. Available from http://www.cov.com/files/Publication/13800cb1-53df-44f7-8fc6-acef546be00b/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/02f82d54-11c6-41ce-9dad-b190bfc3309c/oid11576.pdf. [Accessed April 29, 2014]. Morgan Lewis. (2009) European Court of Justice Delivers Mixed Message on Parallel Trade. Morgan Lewis. [Online] October 6, 2009. Available from http://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/ATR_EuropeanParallelTrade_LF_06oct09.pdf. [Accessed